QUOTE

Hi mild melody , you must have misconception about relative theory, whereby you seems to posses the same level of talent.

The present science describes atomic structure with idea of Broglie particles and wave equation of Schrödinger. However in our scale of nature the experience of controlling natural theory does not exist. We do not know what they mean. To enforce the distance, we have to replace lost radius by incorporation into energy, mass and charge. The problem can be that the strangest phenomena in our science coincide with different forms of the same physics. The relativity of Einstein has curved the space absorbing associated with the condensation of a mass.

For the relativity there should exist a proportion of mass, energy, and curvature space, implied in the atom. The atom is electromagnetic energy accepted like E = mc2. Also in the atom gravitational effects are proportional to mass and are inversely proportional to the square of distance.

We see how the nature maintains some fundamental mathematical games ( goes to mathey1010) to form its structures. Suppose you that order and the symmetries that it shows the rule also adopt the Principle of Laves, of the possible higher symmetry for their interior stability, starting from the use of the numbers elementary adopted by the quantum mechanics. Therefore the fragmentation of continuity is impossible by changing the distance factor of the planets.

Pooja jee, thank you very very much for the valuable post, and for all that you shared in it. You reminded me, to some extent, the days of my school where i used to stury science.

and i think you are educated in some fields concerned to my post, and so there are a lot of reasons for me to agree with you, apart from your explanations.

I was looking forward for, while posting this argument, these types of strong arguments, and thankfully i am getting them.